Drug Distribution (PWID)
Contact an Experienced State College Criminal Defense Attorney Regarding Your Drug Distribution Charges
Possession with the Intent to Distribute a controlled substance or the actual delivery of a controlled substance, often generally referred to as “PWID” is criminalized under the Pennsylvania Controlled Substances, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act and is a serious crime in Pennsylvania. No matter what type of drug or the amounts involved, PWID constitutes an ungraded felony offense. The penalties for these offenses are based on the type of drug involved, the amount of the drug or drugs involved, and the number of previous PWID offenses on an individual’s record.
Understanding sentencing exposure as it pertains to a charge of PWID involves a complicated interaction of the Pennsylvania Sentencing Guidelines, the Pennsylvania Controlled Substances, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act, and any mandatory sentences applicable under the Pennsylvania Crimes Code or the Sentencing Guidelines. To further complicate matters, the constitutionality of many of Pennsylvania’s mandatory sentencing provisions is in doubt in the wake of a seminal 2013 case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States, Alleyne v. United States, 133 S. Ct. 2151, (2013), which has led to jurisdictional differences from county to county in the way the law is applied. This will remain the case until the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania decides how Alleyne must be interpreted and applied to Pennsylvania law.
To understand your sentencing exposure on a charge of Possession with the Intent to Distribute, you must know the following:
The drug, or the active prohibited chemical ingredient in the drug involved
The weight of the drugs intended for distribution
The “Offense Gravity Score” associated with the amount of the particular drug involved.
The defendant’s “Prior Record Score”
Whether the immediate offense is a first, second, or subsequent offense
Whether any mandatory sentences apply (relating to weight, school zone, delivery by non-drug dependent person to a person under the age of 18, etc.)
Suppose an individual with a prior record score of 2 was convicted of Possession with the Intent to Distribute 13.5g of heroin and the conviction was a second PWID offense. Because of the 13.5g involved, this would fall into the 10-50g heroin weight category which carries an offense gravity score of 8. For the individual in our example with prior record score of 2, by referring to the current Pennsylvania Sentencing Matrix, you will see that the individual faces a minimum sentence in the range of 15-21 months and may be eligible for the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections Boot Camp program. At 15-21 months, unless a very compelling argument was made on behalf of our hypothetical individual to mitigate the sentence to 12 months (which may be unlikely given that it is a second offense), a sentence of 15-21 months would necessarily constitute a state prison sentence. Because it is a second offense, the maximum sentence available to the court for heroin distribution doubles from 15 years and a $250,000 fine to 30 years and a $500,000 fine. Furthermore, if Commonwealth were permitted to seek a mandatory sentence under §7508 of the Pennsylvania Crimes Code, because it is a second offense the court would have no choice but to sentence our individual to 5 years and a potential $30,000 fine.
*To better understand how criminal sentencing in Pennsylvania works, please see our General Overview of Pennsylvania Sentencing here.
Pennsylvania law treats every common street drug differently. If the drug in our hypothetical example above had been cocaine instead of heroin, the maximum available sentence would have been 20 years instead of thirty. Had it been marijuana, the maximum would have been 10 years and the standard-range minimum sentence available to the court would have included merely probation.
Only an experienced criminal defense attorney can advise you on your particular sentencing exposure and any available factual or legal defenses. The State College criminal defense attorneys at Rehmeyer & Allatt have extensive experience representing individuals charged with Possession with the Intent to Distribute controlled substances. Attorney Allatt has successfully gotten drugs “thrown out of court” for illegal searches and seizures because of motions to suppress evidence and has negotiated countless plea agreements which have allowed clients to avoid jail time or drastically reduce their sentences.
If you or a loved one have been charged with Possession with the Intent to Distribute a Controlled Substance, we urge you to contact the State College criminal defense lawyers at Rehmeyer & Allatt for a free consultation